WebSep 16, 2010 · Akzo Nobel v. Commission White & Case European Union September 16 2010 Long-running battle ends in denial of legal privilege for in-house lawyers The Court … WebDec 9, 2024 · 27 Arrêt de la Cour de justice du 10 septembre 2009, Akzo Nobel e.a./Commission, C-97/08, point 58, arrêt de la Cour de justice du 20 janvier 2011, General Quimica/Commission, C-90/09, point 37 ; voir également l’arrêt de la cour d’appel de Paris du 29 mars 2012, Lacroix Signalisation e.a., 2011/01228, pages 18 et 20. 10
2024-314 Report - Akzo Nobel and Others v Commission - Lexxion
WebIn the period concerned by the Commission investigation, Akzo Nobel the parent company of the group, held, directly or indirectly, all the shares in the other appellants. Akzo … WebSep 28, 2010 · The European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) in Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (Case C-550/07 P) (the “Akzo case”) has confirmed that internal communications by company employees with in-house counsel are not legally privileged in competition law investigations by the … sandwell maths
U.S. Privilege Following Akzo Nobel v. European …
WebOct 26, 2010 · Belgium: Akzo Nobel Chemicals v Commission 26 October 2010 by Mark D. Powell (Brussels), Genevra Forwood (Brussels) and Stefan Mahoney (Brussels) White & Case Long-running battle ends in denial of legal privilege for in-house lawyers WebDAVIS, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal by Akzo, N.V., Enka B.V., Aramide Maatschappij v.o.f. and Akzona Inc. (appellants or Akzo) from an exclusion order by the United States International Trade Commission (Commission or trial tribunal) pursuant to §§ 337 and 337(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1337, 1337(a) (1982), prohibiting the … WebMay 5, 2013 · ECJ (3 July 1991), Case C-62/86 – Akzo v Commission [ 1991] ECR I-3359, para. 60. Whish, and Bailey, , Competition Law (Cambridge University Press, 7th edn, 2012 ), p. 182 Google Scholar Cour, and Møllgaard, , ‘ Meaningful and Measurable Market Dominance ’, European Competition Law Review, 24 ( 2003 ), 132 Google Scholar sandwell mbc change of circumstances